Archives for the month of: March, 2013

On Tuesday I visited the Parkhurst house for the first time since it had been vacated by the previous owners.  As we’d only been interested in it for the position of the stand and not for the house itself, I had not previously seen any more of the house than the small area between the front door and the French doors leading out into the garden.  I took a friend along with me for company and between the two of us, we determined that there was not anything of real value that needed saving in the garden and nothing that I needed to be concerned about preserving in the house itself.  The original structure may be over 60 years old but there are no special features such as pressed steel ceilings that in any way redeem it.  Over the years, other bits and pieces have been added on to the house, resulting in a complete mish-mash of styles, levels, window frames and floor coverings.    It is a little frustrating that we are being delayed by the Heritage Committee at this stage when there is absolutely nothing that could interest them in any way.

On Thursday I returned to the house with the architect and the contractor we have employed to demolish the house as soon as the permission to do so is granted.  Between Tuesday afternoon and Thursday morning a few things had changed.  The automatic garage door would not work and we managed to open the pedestrian door onto the street only with considerable difficulty.  The motor for the garage door was still in place but the front door was standing wide open and had been propped in position with bricks.   Inside we found that somebody had managed to gain access to the house and had removed the very old under-cover oven from the kitchen and, from the number of cigarettes that had been smoked, had spent a fair amount of time in the house, probably trying to find other bits and pieces that might be worth removing.

Contractor and Architect on site

Contractor and Architect on site

It’s slightly disconcerting to feel that people become aware so quickly that a property is empty and unprotected and that they are prepared to go to so much trouble to get possession of such very old and well-used appliances.  The contractor did not seem at all surprised by this and assured us that he would take control of the site just as soon as we had signed his contract and that he would arrange for one of his employees to move onto the property as soon as possible.  Needless to say we signed on the spot…

He also explained that he can begin dismantling all the parts of the building that do not fall under the 60 year old limit and that he will start doing that on Monday.

Cottage and Shed can be dismantled immediately

Cottage and Shed can be dismantled immediately

Sometime last year we decided that the time had come for us to think seriously about downsizing; about creating a simpler, cleaner, clearer, home environment on a smaller footprint and with far less clutter.  Now that it’s just the two of us with only occasional visits from the children but quite frequent visits from friends and family, we feel we can live more practically in far less space.

So we started to look around for either a stand on which to build exactly what we would like, or an older home that would lend itself easily to a major renovation.  We wanted to stay in our general area so we could still be close to friends and all our usual ‘haunts’.

Parktown North was our first choice of suburb but we could find neither a house that was bad enough to demolish, nor an appealing stand.  The Parkhurst stands seemed very small for a household still dominated by pets; three dogs and one cat and counting… And then, quite unexpectedly, we encountered an estate agent who listened carefully and then persuaded us to look at a ‘double’ stand in Parkhurst that opened onto a park.  Initially, we resisted but thought we had nothing to lose by just seeing it.  And the rest is history…

Park view to stream

Park view to stream

Late last year we bought a tumbledown house on what promises to be a lovely property.  The stand is 842 sq metres, so considerably smaller than the 3oo0 on which we currently live.  But facing out over a pretty park gives it an illusion of much more space and having a gate in the wall at the bottom of the garden giving direct access onto the green belt, makes it viable for two very elderly retrievers and one very lively spaniel.  So far I’m trying not to think about the adventures the cat might embark on with that untamed extended ‘garden’ as his disposal…

Park view

Park view

Because it was late in the year, things moved slowly and transfer of the property into our name only happened towards the end of January.  Then the past owners had to move out and now, with plans drawn up and waiting to be submitted to the Johannesburg City Council,  we find ourselves waiting – and waiting – for the Heritage Committee to meet and give approval for the demolition of the existing structure.  It seems a new law has come into being requiring that this committee has to grant permission for the demolition of any building more than 60 years old.  In principle I agree with this as I hate seeing beautiful old house flattened but I can’t help wondering if it would be more realistic to have some parameters to this rule, such as any building that was architect-designed or had any sort of special history attached to it.  Neither of which would apply to the property we have acquired.